The International Court of Justice (ICJ) made a significant ruling on January 26, refusing to dismiss the genocide case against Israel. Judge Joan E. Donoghue stated that the court has “prima facie jurisdiction” based on Article 9 of the Genocide Convention. The court president emphasized that a panel of 17 judges concluded that it possesses appropriate jurisdiction, rejecting Israel’s request for case removal.
South Africa’s Application for Provisional Measures
On the same day, the World Court held a hearing on South Africa’s request for provisional measures against Israel, alleging genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
Addressing Israel-Hamas War
Judge Donoghue acknowledged the severe consequences of the Israel-Hamas conflict, citing massive civilian casualties, extensive infrastructure destruction, and the displacement of the majority of Gaza’s population.
Court’s Orders to Israel
The ICJ ordered Israel to take steps to reduce further casualties and damage in Gaza but did not demand an immediate halt to the ongoing offensive. Donoghue stressed that Israel must prevent and punish direct and public incitement to commit genocide.
Reactions and Statements
Following the court’s decision, South African leaders expressed satisfaction. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation released a statement, calling it a “decisive victory for the international rule of law” and a significant step toward justice for the Palestinian people. The statement urged Israel to comply fully with the court’s order.
Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs) with Answers
- What was the International Court of Justice’s decision on January 26 regarding the genocide case against Israel?
- A. The case was dismissed.
- B. The court affirmed jurisdiction.
- C. The case was put on hold.
- D. Israel withdrew the case.
- What did the ICJ order Israel to do in response to the ongoing conflict with Hamas?
- A. Immediately cease the offensive.
- B. Remove the case from the court.
- C. Take steps to reduce casualties.
- D. Continue the military operations.
- What did the South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation state about the ICJ’s decision?
- A. It was a defeat for the international rule of law.
- B. Israel should act against the court’s order.
- C. A decisive victory for the international rule of law.
- D. The court’s decision was irrelevant.