Recently, the Supreme Court made a significant ruling regarding the filing of a suit for declaration of title based on adverse possession. This ruling reversed the findings of the High Court.
Background:
The decision was made by a Bench comprising Justices P.S. Narasimha and Aravind Kumar. The Bench referred to the Judgment of Ravinder Kaur Grewal vs. Manjit Kaur as a precedent.
Key Points:
- The Supreme Court reiterated that a plaintiff can file a suit for declaration of title based on the plea of adverse possession.
- This decision contradicts the findings of the High Court.
Explanation:
The court emphasized that it is a settled position of law that a plaintiff has the right to seek declaration of title through adverse possession.
Implications:
- This ruling clarifies the legal standing for plaintiffs seeking declaration of title based on adverse possession.
- It establishes a precedent for future cases involving similar circumstances.
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) with Answers:
- What did the recent Supreme Court ruling address?
- A) Filing a suit for damages
- B) Filing a suit for declaration of title based on adverse possession
- C) Filing a suit for defamation
- D) Filing a suit for breach of contract
- Answer: B) Filing a suit for declaration of title based on adverse possession
- Who comprised the Bench that made the ruling?
- A) Justices P.S. Narasimha and Aravind Kumar
- B) Justices Ravinder Kaur Grewal and Manjit Kaur
- C) Justices of the High Court
- D) Justices of the District Court
- Answer: A) Justices P.S. Narasimha and Aravind Kumar
- What did the Supreme Court refer to as a precedent in this ruling?
- A) The Judgment of Ravinder Kaur Grewal vs. Manjit Kaur
- B) The Constitution of India
- C) The Indian Penal Code
- D) The Civil Procedure Code
- Answer: A) The Judgment of Ravinder Kaur Grewal vs. Manjit Kaur