In a noteworthy legal development, the Supreme Court issued a significant pronouncement emphasizing the inviolability of valid provisions. The court asserted that a provision, considered perfectly valid, should not undergo a ‘read down’ interpretation solely for the purpose of alleviating its harsh consequences.
Preservation of Legal Integrity
The ruling underscores the court’s commitment to preserving the integrity of legal provisions. It highlights the importance of maintaining the original impact and intent of the law without compromising its efficacy. This stance signifies a strong commitment to the unaltered application of legislation.
Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQs):
- What did the Supreme Court emphasize in its legal pronouncement?
a. Reinterpreting provisions
b. Validity of provisions
c. Mitigating consequences
d. Diluting legal impact
Answer: b. Validity of provisions - What is the court’s stance on the ‘read down’ interpretation of provisions?
a. Encouraged for all provisions
b. Acceptable for valid provisions
c. Discouraged for harsh consequences
d. Not permissible for valid provisions
Answer: d. Not permissible for valid provisions - What does the ruling underscore regarding legal provisions?
a. Flexibility in interpretation
b. Preservation of integrity
c. Dilution of impact
d. Varied application
Answer: b. Preservation of integrity - What is the court’s commitment regarding the application of legislation?
a. Flexibility in interpretation
b. Strong stance on unaltered application
c. Dilution of impact
d. Varied application
Answer: b. Strong stance on unaltered application