The Supreme Court has made a significant decision regarding the bail application of the Wadhwans in the DHFL case. The court has set aside their bail, stating that default bail cannot be claimed based on the grounds that investigations are pending against other accused.
Default Bail Denied:
The Supreme Court has ruled against granting default bail to the Wadhwans. This decision is based on the argument that default bail cannot be sought merely because investigations are ongoing against other individuals involved in the case.
DHFL Case:
The Wadhwans were seeking bail in connection to the DHFL case. However, the court has clarified that the pending investigations against other accused parties do not qualify as a valid reason for granting default bail to the Wadhwans.
Implications of the Decision:
This decision by the Supreme Court has broader implications for the legal interpretation of default bail. It reinforces the idea that such bail cannot be automatically claimed solely due to ongoing investigations against co-accused individuals.
Conclusion:
In a significant legal development, the Supreme Court has set aside the bail application of the Wadhwans in the DHFL case. The ruling emphasizes that default bail cannot be claimed on the basis of investigations pending against other accused individuals, highlighting a nuanced perspective on this legal matter.