In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the anti-profiteering provisions in the Goods and Services Tax (GST). Over 100 companies, including major players like Hindustan Unilever, Patanjali, Jubilant Foodworks, and Phillips, had filed petitions against these provisions. The court emphasized the public interest perspective of these provisions, highlighting their role in ensuring a commensurate reduction in prices during GST rate changes or due to input tax credit. While providing relief to companies, the court acknowledged the possibility of price hikes due to factors such as cost escalation and arbitrary exercise of power by anti-profiteering bodies. The court directed that these concerns would be examined on a case-by-case basis, with matters to be listed before a division bench for further directions on February 8. Additionally, the court clarified that there is no fixed formula for determining anti-profiteering and provided guidance on the distribution of profiteered amounts among home buyers, based on per square feet. The ruling strengthens the role of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA), established in November 2017, in overseeing measures to ensure companies pass on the benefits of input tax credit and GST reduction to consumers by reducing prices.